ACTION: Demand U.S. Left-Leaning Media Outlets Report on The Funding to Institutionalize “Gender Identity” Ideology

The Issue

The U.S. left-leaning media is not reporting on the funding by philanthropists, NGO’s, and the elites to institutionalize “gender identity” ideology, even though the definition of “gender identity” remains unclear in law and policy (the definitions that have been put forth are confusing, tautological, and inconsistent).

What You Can Do

Email members of the media and tell them to report on this phenomenon (script below).

Email Script

Dear Left-leaning Media,

Conservative media and radical feminists have both provided well documented journalistic research on the sources and fantastic amounts of funding being used to rapidly institutionalize “gender identity” ideology into western culture, even though the definition of “gender identity” remains utterly unclear in law and policy. For example, you can find coverage of George Soros’ massive donations from the Washington Times here, in 2016. Women’s Liberation Radio Network covered the topic, and its impact on lesbians in 2017. In 2018 Feminist Current, a popular feminist media site, covered the rapid and unquestioning rise of “gender identity” ideology in academia. Also in 2018, The Federalist published an extensive expose, by a feminist, on the funding from elites invested in the medical industrial complex who profit from the rapid proliferation of “gender identity” ideology. Another article by the same author covered the marketing of “gender identity” ideology and its relationship to Hollywood. Sue Donym published a breathtaking unmasking of the methods of financing driving “gender identity” ideology into western societies, on a Medium blog in 2018.

In contrast, from more left-leaning media, we have silence. Deafening silence. Why?  I am overwhelmed by the sheer amount of data and research combined in just the pieces I’ve mentioned and the implications of that information, especially considering the fact, as previously mentioned, that the very definition of “gender identity” remains unclear in law and policy (the definitions that have been put forth are confusing, tautological, and inconsistent). It is your journalistic duty to provide the public with these well documented perspectives, offering them the opportunity for a full evaluation of this social engineering which is impacting our society and culture at every level.

I urge you to fulfill your journalistic responsibility to the public and report on the extraordinary monetary forces at work to legislate and institutionalize “gender identity” ideology as the new cultural norm.

Sincerely,
[YOUR NAME]

Targets

Copy and paste this email list:

guardian.readers@theguardian.com, USinfo@theguardian.com,
mcgrory@globe.com, readers@washpost.com, acooper@sfchronicle.com,  dbaquet@nytimes.com, cosmo.mail@hearst.co.uk, evening@cbsnews.com, NBCNewsMediaRelations@nbcuni.com, readers@washpost.com, Rachel@msnbc.com, betsy.reed@theintercept.com, submissions@truthdig.com, info@truthout.org, counterpunch@counterpunch.org, queries@cjr.org, letters@harpers.org, hrwpress@hrw.org, scoop@motherjones.com, mail@newleftreview.org, comments@newstatesman.co.uk, support@salon.com, slateoffice@slate.com, newsdesk@independent.co.uk, Stephanie.ebbert@globe.com, editorialsubmissions@nymag.com, comments@nymag.com, outreach@democracynow.org, stories@democracynow.org, nermeen@democracynow.org, mike@democracynow.org, producers@democracynow.org, amy@democracynow.org, metro@sfchronicle.com, Charlotte.greensit@theintercept.com, jeffrey_goldberg@theatlantic.com, swati@theatlantic.com, sgaiser@sfexaminer.com, swilliams@abqjournal.com, dharris@azcapitaltimes.com, webteam@postandcourier.com